Paul Nation talks about four strands that need to be balanced:
Meaning- focused input (listening or reading, focus on communication, comprehension of the input and just a few unfamiliar language items. E.g. listening to stories, guided reading etc.)
Language-focused learning (receptive or productive, focus on language features, conscious attempt to learn a language item. E.g. dictation, vocabulary learning, pronunciation drill, text analysis, guided speaking etc.)
Meaning-focused output (speaking or writing, focus on communication, production of comprehensible messages, opportunity to improve control or skill or language items. E.g. information gap activities, letter writing, role play. etc)
Fluency Development (receptive or productive, focus on communication, pressure to perform at a higher level than normal, no unfamiliar language items at all. E.g. speed reading, fast writing, repeated talks e.g. 321 activities etc.)
I want to include these ideas when planning to make sure I cover them all. I definitely overlook fluency development and have never planned for this.
I also found this interesting -
'... should include form focused instruction in the sound system, vocabulary, grammar and discourse areas. Form-focused learning can speed up learning, help learners to overcome barriers to language development and can have a positive effect on meaning-focused learning. It should take up about 25% of the learning time. The language features focused on must be reasonably simple, be at an appropriate stage of development to benefit from the attention; and if the purpose of the learning is to make learning from meaning-focused input more effective, then it is sufficient to raise learners’ awareness of the item and its use. Language-focused practice does not usually lead directly to implicit knowledge of language that is needed for normal communication, it is more of a support for meaning-focused activities.'
There is still a place for form learning, we just have to decide what is the focus, will learning form help to improve future learning or is it deviating from meaning.
This is from:
[Primary ESOL] ESOL Course Design - The first 10 principles: Primary ESOL Online Update, 3 July 2017 (emails)
To help with fluency I have chosen a sentence from each students writing that contains errors and I have rewritten it for them at the top of the page. Next session I will get them to write it as many times as they can in one minute, we will record the results and then repeat. This way they are fluently learning the correct grammar/vocab that they didn't know.